On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here one of the improvements which can be done is that after prefix-suffix > match, instead of going byte-by-byte copy as per LZ format we can directly > copy all the remaining part of tuple but I think that would require us to use > some different format than LZ which is also not too difficult to do, but the > question is do we really need such a change to handle the above kind of > worst case.
Why use LZ at all? Why not *only* prefix/suffix? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
