Nigel J. Andrews wrote: > It gave me the log all the way up to the 1.64 revision with the REL7_3_STABLE > label assigned to revision 1.64.0.2 > > Revision 1.64 apparently backing out my patch which made 1.63. > > I had a brain wave and did the cvs log command which was what lead me to try > specifying revisions. As I say it looks like a lack of knowledge about how cvs > works for these things. I always thought it worked like RCS and gave a diff > against the latest checked in but obviously not. > > BTW, I've found Neil Conway's patch for this file, email dated 25th Sept., I > can forward it or apply it and include the changes along with whatever I do for > my next submission, which ever you'd prefer. I'd suggest it's easy to let me > apply and submit it due to overlaps. >
Sure, sounds good. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
