On 2014-02-14 20:46:01 +0000, Greg Stark wrote:
> Going over this I think this is still a potential issue:
> 
> On 31 Jan 2014 15:56, "Andres Freund" <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> > I am not sure that explains the issue, but I think the redo action for
> > truncation is not safe across crashes.  A XLOG_SMGR_TRUNCATE will just
> > do a smgrtruncate() (and then mdtruncate) which will iterate over the
> > segments starting at 0 till mdnblocks()/segment_size and *truncate* but
> > not delete individual segment files that are not needed anymore, right?
> > If we crash in the midst of that a new mdtruncate() will be issued, but
> > it will get a shorter value back from mdnblocks().
> >
> > Am I missing something?
> >
> 
> I'm not too familiar with md.c but my reading of the code is that we
> truncate the files in reverse order?

That's what I had assumed as well, but it doesn't look that way:

    v = mdopen(reln, forknum, EXTENSION_FAIL);

    priorblocks = 0; /* <- initial value */
    while (v != NULL)
    {
        MdfdVec    *ov = v;

        if (priorblocks > nblocks)
        {
            /* truncate entire segment */
        }
        else if (priorblocks + ((BlockNumber) RELSEG_SIZE) > nblocks)
        {
            /* truncate entire segment */
        }
        else
        {
            /* nothing to do, all needed */
        }
        priorblocks += RELSEG_SIZE;
    }

So, according to that we start at segment 0, right?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- 
 Andres Freund                     http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to