On 1/24/14, 3:52 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Bruce Momjian<br...@momjian.us> wrote:
>
>Is everyone else OK with this approach? Updated patch attached.
>
Hi,
I started to look at this patch and i found that it fails an assertion
as soon as you run a VACUUM FULL after a lazy VACUUM even if those are
on unrelated relations. For example in an assert-enabled build with
the regression database run:
VACUUM customer;
[... insert here whatever commands you like or nothing at all ...]
VACUUM FULL tenk1;
Is anyone else confused/concerned that regression testing didn't pick this up?
The vacuum.sql test does not test lazy vacuum at all, and I can't seem to find
any other tests that test lazy vacuum either...
--
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect j...@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
