On 2014-02-17 23:07:45 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > I don't think this really has gone above Needs Review yet. > I am not sure that this remark makes the review of this patch much > progressing :(
Uh. What should I then say if a patch is marked as ready for committer by the author, after it previously had been marked such when it clearly wasn't? Your review just seems to confirm that it wasn't ready? If the patch is isn't marked "needs review" in the CF it's less likely to get timely review. And when a committer looks at the patch it'll just be determined at not being ready again, making it less likely to get committed. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
