On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:25:33PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:38:29AM +0100, Bjorn Munch wrote: > >> What Solaris version, and what version of sh? sh on Solaris isn't > >> necessarily the "real" bourne shell. In Solaris 11 it's actually > >> ksh93. > > > This was Solaris 9. > > Isn't that out of support by Oracle?
It certainly might be --- I have no idea. What surprised me is that we are relying solely on system() to block signals to pg_ctl-spawned servers. The question is whether that is sufficient and whether we should be doing more. I don't think we have to make adjustments just for Solaris 9. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
