2014-02-17 22:16, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > More generally, it doesn't look to me like these upgrade scripts are > complete; shouldn't they be creating some new objects, not just replacing > old ones?
The actual patches are on the previous mail [1]. I was just trying to solve the problem that btree_gist cannot be loaded because of the new operator class. > In short we probably need to think a bit harder about what this patch is > proposing to do. It seems fairly likely to me that some other approach > would be a better idea. How about only removing the inet and the cidr operator classes from btree_gist. btree-gist-drop-inet-v2.patch does that. [1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cae2gyzxc0fxewe59sfduznq24c+frbdmgxwwvbyvmeanate...@mail.gmail.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
