On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Bernd Helmle <maili...@oopsware.de> wrote:
> > > --On 20. Februar 2014 09:51:47 -0500 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Yeah. The other reason that you can't just transparently change the >> behavior is error handling: people are used to seeing either all or >> none of the output of a query. In single-row mode that guarantee >> fails, since some rows might get output before the server detects >> an error. >> > > That's true. I'd never envisioned to this transparently either, exactly of > this reason. However, i find to have single row mode somewhere has some > attractiveness, be it only to have some code around that shows how to do it > right. But i fear we might complicate things in psql beyond what we really > want. > > Yes. Fixing this bug doesn't seem to be worth the code complexity it will add, esp. when the work around exists. OR, other option is when sufficiently large output is encountered (larger than some predefined value MAX_ROWS or something), psql behaves as if FETCH_COUNT is set to MAX_ROWS. Documenting this behaviour wouldn't be a problem and would not be a problem, I guess. > -- > Thanks > > Bernd > -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company
