Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > I didn't suggest anywhere that the proposed patch changed the rules at > all- instead I was trying to point out that by adding this functionality > and *not* changing the way that lookup is done *is going to cause > confusion*.
I don't see any confusion about dynamic library name resolving added from the extension_control_path, I'm sorry. Simply because I don't expect people to use the facility without a third party software designed to fill-in the gap. You're saying that the backend should fill the gap, I'm saying that it should not. Or maybe within another patch entirely. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
