On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
> Indeed.  The root of the problem here is that we've never really thought
> about changing a type's default opclass before.  I don't think that a
> two-line change in pg_dump fixes all the issues this will bring up.

I think we did actually do this once. When you replaced rtree with
gist as the default opclass for the rtree method. IIRC you did it by
making "rtree" a synonym for "gist" and since the opclass wasn't
specified the default gist opclass kicked in automatically.

-- 
greg


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to