On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Oleg Bartunov <obartu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, looks like a bug.
I guess this is down to the continued definition of gin_hstore_ops as an opclass with text storage?: + CREATE OPERATOR CLASS gin_hstore_ops + DEFAULT FOR TYPE hstore USING gin + AS + OPERATOR 7 @>, + OPERATOR 9 ?(hstore,text), + OPERATOR 10 ?|(hstore,text[]), + OPERATOR 11 ?&(hstore,text[]), + FUNCTION 1 bttextcmp(text,text), + FUNCTION 2 gin_extract_hstore(internal, internal), + FUNCTION 3 gin_extract_hstore_query(internal, internal, int2, internal, internal), + FUNCTION 4 gin_consistent_hstore(internal, int2, internal, int4, internal, internal), + STORAGE text; -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
