On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > Alright- so do you feel that the simple ctidscan use-case is a > sufficient justification and example of how this can be generally > useful that we should be adding these hooks to core..? I'm willing to > work through the patch and clean it up this weekend if we agree that > it's useful and unlikely to immediately be broken by expected changes..
Yeah, I think it's useful. But based on Tom's concurrently-posted review, I think there's probably a good deal of work left here. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
