On Mar 5, 2014, at 8:49 AM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
> I think that was my estimate, but Peter did offer to do it. He certainly > asserted that the effort required would not be great. I'm all for taking up > his offer. +1 to this. Can you and Peter collaborate somehow to get it knocked out? > Incidentally, this would probably have been done quite weeks ago if people > had not objected to my doing any more on the feature. Of course missing the > GIN/GIST ops was not part of the design. Quite the contrary. That was my understanding, as well. Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
