Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> ... But ISTM that if this makes sense for
> >> our internal temp files, it makes sense for user-created temp tables
> >> as well.
>
> > Yes, I was thinking that, but of course, those are real tables, rather
> > than just files. Not sure how clean it will be to mix those in the same
> > directory. We haven't in the past. Is it a good idea?
>
> Sure we have --- up till recently, pg_temp files just lived in the
> database directory. I think it was you that added the pg_temp
> subdirectory, and the reason you did it was to let people symlink the
> temp files to someplace else. But that's just a zeroth-order
> approximation to providing a tablespace facility for these things.
OK, TODO updated:
* Allow sorting, temp files, temp tables to use multiple work
directories
FYI, I originally created that directory so a postmaster startup could
clear that dir.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
