On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 12:07:21PM -0500, Gurjeet Singh wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > This is a performance patch, so it should come with benchmark results > demonstrating that it accomplishes its intended purpose. I don't see > any. > > > Yes, this is a performance patch, but as the subject says, it saves a few > instructions. I don't know how to write a test case that can measure savings > of > skipping a few instructions in a startup sequence that potentially takes > thousands, or even millions, of instructions.
Are we saying we don't want this patch? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
