Yury Bokhoncovich wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes, I agree with you Manfred, but more people _don't_ want it to
> > change, and like it the way it is, so we will just keep it and add
> > now("string").
>
> IMHO the best way could be GUC-default/SET session-based variable
> controlling the behaviour. By default old Pg one, but ppl can set
> standard-compliant. Such changes were done often in past, look at "group
> by" behaviour changes 6.4->6.5, default Pg datetime representation format
> change, etc. I think those who concern interoperability confirm that it's
> much easy to add one SET per session then replace all CURRENT_STAMP to
> now(blah-blah-blah). Moreover, ppl who need old behaviour can easily
> revert to this by just one SET (in case GUC is set to new behaviour).
Let's see if people want the more standards-compliant behavior before
adding a GUC, no?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
