On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > First, I'll note that one of the reasons we haven't had a bunch of > reports from the field about this is that a lot of our users have yet to > apply 9.3.3, so if they have corruption issues they probably attribute > them to the issues which are fixed in 9.3.3. I know that's the case > with our customer base.
I was speculating that the reason we saw a sudden bunch after 9.3.3 might be that there might be a number of people who wait N releases before upgrading and the number of people for whom the value of N is 3 might be significant. Or it could be a coincidence. Users will only notice if they fail over to their standby or run queries on their standby. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
