On 03/16/2014 03:23 PM, MauMau wrote:
From: "Amit Kapila" <amit.kapil...@gmail.com>
How about using pg_receivexlog for archiving purpose?
pg_receivexlog is good in that it does fsync(). But it seems difficult
to use correctly, and I'm not sure if I can catch all WAL segments
without any loss. pg_receivexlog must be started with postmaster and
monitored with some measures. This won't be very easy at least on Windows.
Replication slots should solve the issue of making sure to catch all of
the WAL.
--
Andreas Karlsson
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
