Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> writes:
> Yeah, it's a bit silly that each resource manager has to do that on
> their own. It would be useful to have a memory context that was
> automatically reset between each WAL record. In fact that should
> probably be the default memory context you run the WAL redo routines in.
+1
> But even if we do that, I'm not in a hurry to remove rm_startup/cleanup.
> They seem generally useful, even if they're not actually used for much
> anymore.
Agreed; they aren't hurting us and they could be useful.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
