On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I don't have strong feelings about the feature, but introducing a guc > for it feels entirely ridiculous to me. This is a minor detail in an > error message, not more.
I agree. It's just a HINT. It's quite helpful in certain particular contexts, but in the grand scheme of things isn't all that important. I am being quite conservative in trying to anticipate cases where on balance it'll actually hurt more than it will help. I doubt that there actually are any. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
