On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > So basically, I think having pg_ctl try to do what this patch proposes > is a bad idea.
I'm not a Windows person either, but I tend to agree. I can't think that this is going to be very robust ... and if it's not going to be robust, what's the point? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
