Oh, that's right. I had forgotten that it wasn't for general PostgreSQL use. Since it's a ecpg deal only, I guess I remove my objection.
Greg On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 09:18, Tom Lane wrote: > Greg Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Can we please hold off until bison 1.50 becomes a defacto? > > We don't have a whole lot of choice, unless you prefer releasing a > broken or crippled ecpg with 7.3. > > In practice this only affects people who pull sources from CVS, anyway. > If you use a tarball then you'll get prebuilt bison output. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
