On 4/15/14, 11:11 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> writes: >> On 4/14/14, 10:30 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >>> Yes. It probably won't be a huge change, but it will need a bit of code. > >> It might be more future-proof if the build farm just called make >> check-world and used some other way to identify the individual tests in >> that output. Otherwise, we'll need a new build farm release every time >> a test suite is added. > > That argument would be more convincing if "make check-world" worked > on Windows ...
What about it doesn't work on Windows? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
