On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree. I don't think the idea of pushing this into the > log_line_prefix stuff as a one-off is a very good one. Sure, we could > wedge it in there, but we've got an existing precedent that everything > that you can get with log_line_prefix also shows up in the CSV output > file. And it's easy to imagine LOTS more counters that somebody might > want to have. Time spent planning, time spent executing, time spent > waiting for disk I/O, time spent returning results to client, and I'm > sure people will think of many others. I think this will balloon out > of control if we don't have a more systematic design for this sort of > thing.
Can't we think of some infrastructure similar to what is done for log_duration and log_min_duration_statement? Current it prints like below: LOG: duration: 343.000 ms statement: create table t1(c1 int); Let us say if user wants to track lock wait time a statement has spent, then enable some config parameter (either log_lock_duration or some other convenient way) LOG: lock duration: 'x' ms statement: create table t1(c1 int); With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
