On 22/04/14 09:25, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-04-21 17:21:20 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 02:08:51PM -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
If the community had more *BSD presence I think it would be great
but it isn't all that viable at this point. I do know however that
no-one in this community would turn down a team of FreeBSD advocates
helping us make PostgreSQL awesome for PostgreSQL.
I don't think we would even implement a run-time control for Linux or
Windows for this, so I don't even think it is a FreeBSD issue.
I think some of the arguments in this thread are pretty damn absurd. We
have just introduced dynamic_shared_memory_type.
+1
I was just thinking the same thing...
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
