On 22 April 2014 13:15, MauMau <maumau...@gmail.com> wrote: > Great! I'm looking forward to seeing PostgreSQL evolve as an analytics > database for data warehousing. Is there any reason why in-memory database > and MPP is not included?
Those ideas are valid; the features are bounded by resource constraints of time and money, as well as by technical skills/ capacities of my fellow developers. My analysis has been that implementing parallelism has lower benefit/cost ratio than other features, as well as requiring more expensive servers (for MPP). I expect MPP to be an eventual end goal from BDR project. > Are you planning to include the above features in 9.5 and 9.6? Yes > Are you > recommending other developers not implement these features to avoid > duplication of work with AXLE? This was more to draw attention to the work so that all interested parties can participate in producing something useful. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
