On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Feedback in this thread was, "we want something like this in libpq, but not
> the thing you proposed".  But there have been no concrete counter-proposals,
> and some of the responses did not take into account the inherent
> complexities of round-trip avoidance.  So I'm not sure how to move this
> topic forward.

What exactly do you mean by not taking into account?

I do not believe you responded to my proposed interface. I'm not
requesting a change in roundtrip avoidance measures, just the
interface.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to