On 23.4.2014 16:07, Tom Lane wrote: > > To be concrete: let's add a new boolean parameter with the semantics > of "final function takes extra dummy arguments" (default false). > There would need to be one for the separate moving-aggregate final > function too, of course. > > The best naming idea I've got right now is "finalfunc_extra" and > "mfinalfunc_extra", but maybe somebody can do better?
Do we really need a separate parameter for this? Couldn't this be decided simply using the signature of the final function? Either it has a single parameter (current behavior), or it has the same parameters as the state transition function (new behavior). regards Tomas -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
