On 4/17/14, 9:38 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
But the ability to easily spin up temporary branches for testing would
>>also be great. Unfortunately, I suspect that only a minority of the
>>buildfarm owners would choose to participate, which would make it less
>>useful, but if we could solve that problem I'd be all in favor of it.
>... Of course, all this would be done in my copious spare time*cough*. I'm
>not sure this would be the best use of it.
I agree that this would not be worth the effort needed to make it happen.
There's also a sizeable security risk there, of someone putting something
malicious in a branch and then triggering a run from that branch. I suppose
that could be overcome if this was purposefully limited to the main git repo
that only our core committers had access to, but we'd need to be careful.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect j...@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
