On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote: > So, apart from cleaning up the code, we really need to take a close look at > the on-disk format now. The code can be cleaned up later, too, but we're > going to be stuck with the on-disk format forever, so it's critical to get > that right. > > First, a few observations: > > * JENTRY_ISFIRST is redundant. Whenever you deal with the Jentry struct, you > know from the context which element in the array it is. > > * JENTRY_ISNEST is set but never used. > > * JENTRY_ISBOOL is defined as (JENTRY_ISNUMERIC | JENTRY_ISNEST), which > seems confusing. > > I'm going to proceed refactoring those things, which will change the on-disk > format. It's late in the release cycle - these things really should've been > cleaned up earlier - but it's important to get the on-disk format right. > Shout if you have any objections. +1. It is saner to do that now than never. -- Michael
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
