On 05/07/2014 09:45 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > I think what Craig actually tries to propose is to mark all GUCs > currently exported in headers PGDLLIMPORT. Currently it's easy to have > extensions that work on sane systems but not windows. If they're already > exposed in headers I don't think changes get any harder just because thy > also can get used on windows...
Yes, rather. Exporting GUCs that're currently static wouldn't make sense. I'm just taking about making what works on !windows work on Windows. If a GUC is declared extern in a header, it should be PGDLLIMPORT. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
