On 8 May 2014 15:25, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > * Simon Riggs (si...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: >> On 8 May 2014 14:40, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: >> > Allow me to re-state your suggestion here: >> > >> > An FDW is loaded which provides hook for join push-down (whatever those >> > end up being). >> > >> > A query is run which joins *local* table A to *local* table B. Standard >> > heaps, standard indexes, all local to this PG instance. >> > >> > The FDW which supports join push-down is then passed this join for >> > planning, with local sub-plans for the local tables. >> >> Yes that is correct; thank you for confirming your understanding with me. > > I guess for my part, that doesn't look like an FDW any more.
If it works, it works. If it doesn't, we can act otherwise. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
