On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Heikki Linnakangas >> <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote: >>> I agree the new behavior is better, and we should just remove the Open Items >>> entry. > >> Yes. I just removed that entry. > > Our practice in past years has been to move items to a separate "Resolved > Issues" section rather than just delete them. I fixed the page to look > that way.
Yes. Thanks! Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
