On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 05:46:49PM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote: > On Monday, January 27, 2014, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Simon Riggs > > <si...@2ndquadrant.com<javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > On 26 January 2014 12:58, Andres Freund > > > <and...@2ndquadrant.com<javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > >> On 2014-01-25 20:26:16 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > > >>> Shouldn't this patch be in the January commitfest? > > >> > > >> I think we previously concluded that there wasn't much chance to get > > >> this into 9.4 and there's significant work to be done on the patch > > >> before new reviews are required, so not submitting it imo makes sense. > > > > > > I think we should make this a priority feature for 9.5 > > > > +1. I can't think of many things we might do that would be more important. > > > Can anyone guess how likely this approach is to make it into 9.5? > I've been pondering some incremental improvements over what we have > now, but if this revolutionary approach has a high chance of landing > then any work on incremental improvements would be pointless.
How much work do you anticipate for the description and PoC of whatever it is you've been pondering? Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
