Hi Hackers, This came up recently on general list (and I've just hit the same issue today): http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cab7npqtlmmn1ltb5we0v0do57ip0u73ykwzbzytaxdf1caw...@mail.gmail.com
Why couldn't postgres re-create the dependent views automatically? I mean it knows which views depend on the altered column and keeps the view definition, no? Would a patch likely to be accepted? How hard do you feel this might be to implement? Any caveat that defeats the purpose of such feature? Thanks. -- Alex -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
