On May 26, 2014, at 6:07 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > This means that if we want to give users control over which implementation > gets selected, we actually need *three* configure switches. In the > attached revision of Matteo's patch, I called them --with-ossp-uuid > (the existing switch name), --with-linux-uuid, and --with-bsd-uuid. > I'm not necessarily wedded to the latter two names; in particular it seems > unfortunate that the right one to use on OS X is --with-linux-uuid. > But I think --with-e2fsprogs-uuid is right out, so it's not clear what > would be better.
How about --with-unix-uuid? Or --with-ext2-uuid? Which one is the default -- or is there one? Should we use some sort of mapping to select the right switch by platform, or if ossp-uuid appears to be installed? Best, David
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
