On May 27, 2014, at 7:44 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > In either case, the problem remains of exactly what to call the > e2fsprogs-derived implementation. It does seem that people who are > familiar with these libraries call it that, but I'm worried that such > a name will confuse those not so familiar.
--with-libuuid? D
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
