On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Just noticed pg_llog is not mentioned in the "Database File Layout"
> section. Wonder if it's an oversight?
>
>
Yes, it is an oversight. Patch attached.

Regards,

-- 
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/storage.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/storage.sgml
index 57e7f09..132169d 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/storage.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/storage.sgml
@@ -78,6 +78,11 @@ Item
 </row>
 
 <row>
+ <entry><filename>pg_llog</></entry>
+ <entry>Subdirectory containing logical replication status data</entry>
+</row>
+
+<row>
  <entry><filename>pg_multixact</></entry>
  <entry>Subdirectory containing multitransaction status data
   (used for shared row locks)</entry>
-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to