Hi, On 2014-05-17 01:34:25 +0200, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2014-05-16 17:02:33 -0400, Steve Singer wrote: > > >I don't think that's going to cut it though. The creation can take > > >longer than whatever wal_sender_timeout is set to (when there's lots of > > >longrunning transactions). I think checking whether last_reply_timestamp > > >= 0 during timeout checking is more robust. > > > That makes sense. > > A patch that does that is attached. > > I've attached a heavily revised version of that patch. Didn't touch all > the necessary places... > > Survives creation of logical replication slots under 'intensive > pressure', with a wal_sender_timeout=10ms. > > Thanks for the bugreport!
Pushed a fix for it. I am pretty sure it will, but could you still test that it fixes your problem? Thanks! Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
