On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:21:44AM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > > Uh, how would that work if you want to compress the background_FPWs? > > Use compressed_background_FPWs? > > We've currently got 1 technique for torn page protection, soon to have > 2 and with a 3rd on the horizon and likely to receive effort in next > release. > > It seems sensible to have just one parameter to describe the various > techniques, as suggested. I'm suggesting that we plan for how things > will look when we have the 3rd one as well. > > Alternate suggestions welcome.
I was just pointing out that we might need compression to be a separate boolean variable from the type of page tear protection. I know I am usually anti-adding-variables, but in this case it seems trying to have one variable control several things will lead to confusion. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
