On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Due to the opened window of the pg_control/catalog version bump a chance > has opened to fix a inconsistency I've recently been pointed > towards: > Namely that replication slots are named 'slot_name' in one half of the > cases and 'slotname' in the other. That's in views, SRF columns, > function parameters and the primary_slotname recovery.conf parameter. > > My personal tendency would be to make it slot_name everywhere except the > primary_slotname recovery.conf parameter. There we already have > precedent for shortening names. > > Other opinions?
I like using "slot_name" everywhere, i.e, even in recovery.conf. primary_slot_name seems not so long name. BTW, what about also renaming pg_llog directory? I'm afraid that a user can confuse pg_log with pg_llog. Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
