On 6/5/14, 9:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Rod Taylor <rod.tay...@gmail.com> writes:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
I'm not entirely convinced that it's worth the extra planning cycles,
though. Given the small number of complaints to date, it might not
be worth doing this. Thoughts?
Would this avoid execution of expensive functions in views when their
output is discarded?
Yes, as long as they're not marked volatile and don't return sets.
That would certainly make it useful for us.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect j...@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
