The closest problem we have is jsonb statistics (lack of, actually) , which prevents use of all the power of jsquery. I hope Jan Urbański could work on this.
Oleg On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Oleg Bartunov <obartu...@gmail.com> wrote: > People, > > we have many other tasks than guessing the language name. > jsquery is just an extension, which we invent to test our indexing > stuff. Eventually, it grew out. I think we'll think on better name > if developers agree to have it in core. For now, jsquery is good > enough to us. > > jsquery name doesn't need to be used at all, by the way. > > Oleg > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:04 PM, David E. Wheeler > <da...@justatheory.com> wrote: >> On Jun 6, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> >>> Maybe we should call it "jsonesque" ;-) >> >> I propose JOQL: JSON Object Query Language. >> >> Best, >> >> David >> >> PS: JAQL sounds better, but [already exists](http://code.google.com/p/jaql/). -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
