Tom Lane wrote: > Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes: > >> lo_new() or lo_make()? An earlier draft of the patch that added > >> lo_create(oid, bytea) had a similar function named make_lo(). > > It appears that lo_make() has a small plurality, but before we lock > that name in, there was one other idea that occurred to me: the > underlying C function is currently named lo_create_bytea(), and > that seems like not an awful choice for the SQL name either. > > Any other votes out there?
I was also going to suggest lo_create_bytea(). Another similar possibility would be lo_from_bytea() -- or, since we have overloading (and we can actually use it in this case without breaking libpq), we could just have lo_from(oid, bytea). -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
