On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Ian Barwick <i...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > From what I've seen in the wild in Japan, Roman/ASCII characters are > widely used for object/attribute names, as generally it's much less > hassle than switching between input methods, dealing with different > encodings etc. The only place where I've seen Japanese characters widely > used is in tutorials, examples etc. However that's only my personal > observation for one particular non-Roman language. And I agree to this remark, that's a PITA to manage database object names with Japanese characters directly. I have ever seen some applications using such ways to define objects though in the past, not *that* many I concur.. -- Michael
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
