On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:28:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > Uh, I think pg_upgrade needs to check that they match too. > > Possibly. What do you think it should do when examining a pg_control > version that lacks the field?
Good question. I have existing cases where fields were removed, but not ones that were added. As we have no way to query the old cluster's value for LOBLKSIZE, I think I will just add code to compare them if they _both_ exist. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
