At 2014-06-19 10:58:34 +0200, pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hello > > pgbouncer has idle_transaction_timeout defined some years without any > problems, so we can take this design > > idle_transaction_timeout
Let's steal the name too. :-) (I didn't realise there was precedent in pgbouncer, but given that the name is in use already, it'll be less confusing to use that name for Postgres as well.) -- Abhijit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
