Tom, * Tom Lane ([email protected]) wrote: > Stephen Frost <[email protected]> writes: > > * Robert Haas ([email protected]) wrote: > >> [ counting bits in ACLs ] > > Wouldn't it be fairly painless to widen AclMode from 32 bits to 64, > and thereby double the number of available bits?
Thanks for commenting on this. I hadn't considered that but I don't see
any particular problem with it either..
> In any case, I concur with the position that this feature patch should
> be separate from a patch to make additional bitspace available.
Certainly. Thanks for your thoughts.
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
