On 06/22/2014 09:02 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: > I (somewhat reluctantly) agree with Kevin that > "idle_in_transaction_session_timeout" (for FATAL) and > "idle_transaction_timeout" (for ERROR) would work.
Given that an IIT timeout has been a TODO for at least 6 years before being addressed, I'm not convinced that we need to worry about what an eventual error vs. fatal timeout should be named or how it should be scoped. Let's attack that when someone actually shows an inclination to work on it. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
