On 24 June 2014 11:02 Jeff Wrote, >I mean that the other commit, the one conflicting with your patch, is still >not finished. It probably would not have been committed if we realized the >problem at the time. That other patch runs analyze in stages at > different settings of default_statistics_target, but it has the loops in the > wrong order, so it analyzes one database in all three stages, then moves to > the next database. I think that these two changes are going to > interact with each other. But I can't predict right now what that > interaction will look like. So it is hard for me to evaluate your patch, > until the other one is resolved.
>Normally I would evaluate your patch in isolation, but since the conflicting >patch is already committed (and is in the 9.4 branch) that would probably not >be very useful in this case. Oh k, Got your point, I will also try to think how these two patch can interact together.. Regards, Dilip
